Does Litify require a separate Salesforce license?

Yes, Litify requires Salesforce platform licenses in addition to Litify licensing. Organizations already using Salesforce for CRM or other functions may have existing licenses that work with Litify. New Salesforce customers need to budget for both. Salesforce Enterprise Edition is the minimum requirement, typically $165 per user per month.

Is Filevine good for mass tort cases?

Yes, Filevine is widely used for mass tort litigation. Its project template system allows firms to create standardized workflows for mass tort case types, and the phase-based management handles large volumes of related cases efficiently. Filevine also supports cross-case reporting and bulk operations that are essential for mass tort portfolio management.

Can I integrate Litify with other Salesforce products?

Yes, this is one of Litify's core advantages. Because Litify is built on Salesforce, it integrates natively with Salesforce Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Marketing Cloud, and any AppExchange application. This allows legal departments to connect case data with CRM data, customer service records, and business analytics in a single platform.

Which platform is better for corporate legal departments?

Litify generally has an advantage for corporate legal departments, particularly those already using Salesforce. The ability to integrate legal matter data with business data, use Salesforce's enterprise reporting, and leverage existing Salesforce administrator expertise makes Litify a natural extension of the corporate technology stack. Filevine is better suited for law firms focused primarily on litigation.

Filevine vs Litify (2026): Honest Comparison for Law Firms

Filevine was founded in 2015 in Salt Lake City and has grown rapidly to serve over 3,000 organizations, including some of the largest plaintiff firms in the United States. The platform was built specifically for legal work, with a phase-based case management system that mirrors how litigation progresses: intake, investigation, demand, negotiation, filing, discovery, trial, and resolution. Each phase has customizable fields, tasks, deadlines, and documents. Filevine also acquired Outlaw (contract management) and built Filevine Leads for intake and case acquisition. Litify was founded in 2016 and is built entirely on the Salesforce platform. This means Litify inherits Salesforce's enterprise infrastructure: SOC 2 Type II compliance, FedRAMP authorization, Salesforce Flow for process automation, Salesforce Reports and Dashboards for analytics, and access to thousands of AppExchange integrations. Litify adds legal-specific layers on top -- matter management, intake, time and billing, document management, and legal-specific reporting. Litify serves mid-size to large firms, corporate legal departments, and government agencies, with notable adoption among AmLaw 200 firms.

Feature	Filevine	Litify
pricing	Custom enterprise pricing, typically $50-$100+/user/mo depending on modules	Custom enterprise pricing, typically $80-$150+/user/mo plus Salesforce licenses
bestFor	High-volume plaintiff firms and litigation practices needing legal-native tools

Filevine's customization is deep but contained within its legal framework. Firms create project templates that define the phases, fields, tasks, and documents for each case type. A mass tort template looks very different from a personal injury template. Custom fields support text, date, currency, dropdown, multi-select, and calculated values. Sections organize related fields into logical groups. The system is flexible enough to handle most legal workflows without code, but customization stays within Filevine's structure. Litify's customization inherits the full power of the Salesforce platform. This means virtually unlimited customization: custom objects, custom fields, validation rules, Apex code for complex business logic, Lightning Web Components for custom UI, and Salesforce Flow for process automation. This power comes with complexity -- Litify implementations often require Salesforce administrators or consultants, and the learning curve for customization is steeper. The practical implication: Filevine is easier to customize for standard legal workflows. Litify is more powerful for organizations with unique or complex requirements that go beyond standard legal case management -- particularly those already invested in the Salesforce ecosystem.

Both platforms excel at litigation case management, but with different strengths. Filevine's phase-based system was designed for litigation from the ground up. The timeline view provides a visual representation of case history. The document management system handles high-volume discovery with tagging, categorization, and search. Filevine's collaboration features allow multiple team members to work on the same case simultaneously with real-time updates. Litify leverages Salesforce's data model for litigation management. Related matters, parties, claims, and documents are all linked through Salesforce's relationship architecture. This makes cross-matter analytics powerful -- identifying patterns across hundreds of related cases (critical for mass tort and class action work). Litify's Einstein AI integration can surface insights from case data that would be invisible to manual review. For pure litigation management, Filevine's legal-native design feels more intuitive to attorneys. For enterprise organizations that need to correlate legal data with business data across the Salesforce ecosystem, Litify's platform integration is uniquely powerful.

Pricing for both platforms is enterprise-custom, but the cost structures differ significantly. Filevine charges per-user licensing that typically ranges from $50 to $100+ per user per month depending on modules selected. Implementation fees vary based on complexity. Litify's pricing includes Litify licensing plus Salesforce platform licensing. Salesforce Enterprise Edition runs approximately $165 per user per month, and Litify adds its legal layer on top. Total per-user costs often exceed $200 per user per month. Implementation costs are typically higher due to Salesforce configuration complexity. Filevine is generally 30-50% less expensive than Litify on a per-user basis. However, organizations already paying for Salesforce licenses for their sales, marketing, or service teams may find Litify's incremental cost more palatable, since they are adding legal capabilities to an existing platform investment.

Choose Filevine if you are a litigation-focused firm that wants purpose-built legal tools with strong customization at a lower price point. Filevine is ideal for plaintiff firms, personal injury practices, and organizations that handle high-volume litigation and want a platform designed specifically for how attorneys work. Choose Litify if your organization is already invested in the Salesforce ecosystem or needs enterprise-grade security certifications (FedRAMP, HIPAA). Litify is ideal for corporate legal departments, government agencies, and AmLaw 200 firms that need to integrate legal operations with broader business processes. InstaThink adds AI-powered automation to either platform, handling intake processing, document generation, and communication workflows with intelligence that adapts to case context and client behavior.

Filevine vs Litify: Enterprise Legal Platforms for High-Volume Litigation

Two Enterprise Architectures for Legal Work

Quick Comparison Overview

Customization and Configuration

Litigation-Specific Features

Total Cost of Ownership

The Verdict: Which Is Right for You?

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Litify require a separate Salesforce license?

Is Filevine good for mass tort cases?

Can I integrate Litify with other Salesforce products?

Which platform is better for corporate legal departments?

Enterprise Automation for Enterprise Firms